Use of “n” Word in Huck Finn

Others debate that it makes race uncomfortable and prevents them from reading this expectant piece of American literature. The mess who believe that the original text should be edited, focus their discontent on the racial t unitary of the language. The fact that the racial spite makes many people shade uncomfortable, is one of the main reasons they tone that way. In the obligate by Philip Rails, the scholar Alan Cribber enunciates, Its a shame that one word should be a barrier between a extraordinary reading experience and a lot of lecturers(Rails 1).That Is exactly what people feel the word Niger is In Huckleberry Finn. It acts as a barrier for people who bring forth It uncomfortable to read, and prevents them from comprehending the writing. In the article Houck Finn goes clean In peeled upshot by Analyzer, an English teacher expresses why she doesnt ring Its k to enforce the word. When youre using obnubilates racial slurs, gender slurs, homosexuality slurs I think y oure victimizing people (Layer 3). It is very aline that blacks in America could get offended if you say the word in a classroom or they read it in the novel.It probably reminds them of the hard eras their ancestors went through or puts them into stereotype that they dont think they belong in. It is very easy for people to become uncomfortable with an tease like the word in Houck Finn. The English teacher in Layers article in like manner says, remember when I first read it in 1986 and I was thinking, Oh, wow. The racial slur Is problematic (Layer 2). Like many people, she feels as though buckle down would be to a greater extent acceptable. It would make people feel more at ease and able to actually read the book without a distracting word.Teachers definitely do not unavoidableness their students to be Immature close the n-word, especially if there ar blacks in the classroom. If the students wouldnt be mature roughly it, it would be nice to have another choice. Readers, stud ents and teachers also should have a choice in what they want to read. If they have the book with in it and dont want it, they should be able to choose what they want. As long as they are comfortable and do not distract or offend the reader than the berth of the book is basen. While the reasons for replacing the slur are reasonable, people are dummy up tryingly against illegaliseing Houck Finn.They feel as though removing the insult would compensate what had happened in the past. The way we treated the slaves was extremely harsh and this Is a way America can remember as well as refrain from making a mistake Like that In the future. virtually other reason readers dont want to censor the novel Is the fact that they are censoring a major novel. In the article Why a new edition of Houck Finn Is By Alexandra Petri, Petri discusses her displeasure with the censorship of the novel. She says, This is like turning expiration of a Salesman into room Heart of Darkness or all the sha bbiness (Petri).Even Mark Twain himself said about the difference between slave and Niger is the difference between the lightning bug and the lightning (Controversy as new edition ). If they censor American literature, what will be next? Many argue that they dont spang where the removing of all things bad will stop. Great deals of readers think that the racial slur is crucial to how the readers interpret the whole story. In the article, Houck Finn goes clean An English prof explains how important it is to be shaken and feel uncomfortable with the word Niger (Layer).It depicts the time period in which it happened accurately, and though it wasnt, and still isnt, something that is acceptable, it still brings out the point of the novel. Mark Twain put the word in there for a purpose, not Just to do it. He uses it to bring out some of the irony. Petri says in her article that regardless of the fact that slavery was in full(a) throttle, Mark Twain was still able to use satire to show h ow wrong it was (Petri). Granted, the usage of the word Niger was normal in that time period, precisely now the satire Twain uses seems al the more relevant.His satire is still shown to this very day. Also, the characters would not have said slave, it is more existent if Houck was to say Niger because, to him, thats what a slave was. It was completely normal, whether we think it was or not. solely in all, the choice is up to the readers. If the reader feels that the n word is overly offensive to read, the option to read a different word should be open to them. We cant distract people from the meaning of the story if they get dissatisfied and embarrassed.No one has the right to deny someone fondness when reading a book. The novel is partially about striving for freedom. While freedom comes with a price, shouldnt everyone have the freedom to choose which way they want to read something? However, it is also important to know that the word was there in the first place. It is true th at the story could lose its meaning by taking out what makes the satire so uncomfortable. The word is an important part of the story, but if people look it than why are they not allowed to enjoy the piece that people honor so much?